A randomized controlled trial to investigate the use of acute coronary syndrome therapy in patients hospitalized with COVID-19: the COVID-19 Acute Coronary Syndrome trial.

BACKGROUND: Patients hospitalized with COVID-19 suffer thrombotic complications. Risk factors for poor outcomes are shared with coronary artery disease. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the efficacy of an acute coronary syndrome regimen in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 and coronary disease risk factors. METHODS: A randomized controlled, open-label trial across acute hospitals (United Kingdom and Brazil) added aspirin, clopidogrel, low-dose rivaroxaban, atorvastatin, and omeprazole to standard care for 28 days. Primary efficacy and safety outcomes were 30-day mortality and bleeding. The key secondary outcome was a daily clinical status (at home, in hospital, on intensive therapy unit admission, or death). RESULTS: Three hundred twenty patients from 9 centers were randomized. The trial terminated early due to low recruitment. At 30 days, there was no significant difference in mortality (intervention vs control, 11.5% vs 15%; unadjusted odds ratio [OR], 0.73; 95% CI, 0.38-1.41; p = .355). Significant bleeds were infrequent and were not significantly different between the arms (intervention vs control, 1.9% vs 1.9%; p > .999). Using a Bayesian Markov longitudinal ordinal model, it was 93% probable that intervention arm participants were more likely to transition to a better clinical state each day (OR, 1.46; 95% credible interval [CrI], 0.88-2.37; Pr [beta > 0], 93%; adjusted OR, 1.50; 95% CrI, 0.91-2.45; Pr [beta > 0], 95%) and median time to discharge to home was 2 days shorter (95% CrI, -4 to 0; 2% probability that it was worse). CONCLUSION: Acute coronary syndrome treatment regimen was associated with a reduction in the length of hospital stay without an excess in major bleeding. A larger trial is needed to evaluate mortality.

Association between Lifestyle- and Circadian Rhythm-Related Changes, and Different Depression Symptom Clusters during COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic brought along a new situation for the population worldwide. The most important safety measures and lockdown expected extreme adaptability and flexibility impacting mental well-being. The aim of our study was to identify associations between changes in lifestyle and circadian rhythm and depression during the pandemic. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Our analysis has been carried out on the Hungarian data set of the COMET-G study including information on lifestyle and circadian rhythm-associated factors and severity of depression and its 3 symptom clusters. Associations were assessed using linear regression models adjusted for age and sex. RESULTS: All variables reflecting changes in quality and quantity of sleep showed significant associations with overall depression scores and the three distinct symptom cluster scores. All variables reflecting importance and changes in physical activity during the pandemic were similarly significantly associated with all depression measures. However, only changes in quality of diet, but not quantity was associated with depression scores. CONCLUSIONS: Our results may confirm the association of circadian rhythm and lifestyle-related environmental factors in deterioration of mental health during COVID and help devise prevention and intervention methods and targets for similar situations.

What you see is what you get? Association of belief in conspiracy theories and mental health during COVID-19.

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic brought about great uncertainty and significant changes in our people's everyday lives. In times of such crises, it is natural to seek explanations to overcome our fears and uncertainties, contributing to an increase to believe in conspiracy theories which, by yielding explanations, decrease uncertainty and ambiguity and may thus have an effect on mental well-being. In spite of this, the majority of research on conspiracy theories focused on their social effects with little attention to psychological effects. Thus, the aim of our present study was to examine the association between belief in conspiracy theories and different aspects of mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic in a general population sample. Methods: Our analyses included data from the Hungarian leg of the COMET-G (COVID-19 MEntal health international for the General population) study. The Hungarian sample included participants who completed a detailed questionnaire assessing belief in seven conspiracy theory items, as well as STAI-S and CES-D to measure state anxiety and depression, respectively, and answered questions related to their change in depression, anxiety and suicidal thoughts during the pandemic. Association between the individual beliefs as well as a composite Conspiracy Theory Belief Score (CTBS) and mental health measures was analysed using linear regression models. Results: Overall, belief in conspiracy theories was relatively moderate in our sample. Sex and age appeared to have a significant effect on the Overall Conspiracy Theory Belief Score (CTBS), with women having a higher score and scores increasing with age. Some of the individual beliefs also showed associations with age and sex. State anxiety and depression was not significantly associated with CTBS, however in case of depression some individual items were, and symptom clusters within CES-D also showed a pattern of association with some of the individual items. As far as changes in mental health during the pandemic is concerned, no association between overall beliefs and changes in anxiety or depression was found. However, higher overall belief in conspiracy theories was associated with a decrease in suicidal thoughts. Discussion: In our study, we explored the association between conspiracy theories and mental well-being as well as its changes during the COVID-19 pandemic. We found a specific pattern of association between belief in distinct theories and some aspects of depression, as well as lower increase in suicidal ideation in association with increased belief in conspiracy theories. Understanding the role of belief in theories can be key to designing mental health interventions when reacting to unforeseen events in the future. (Neuropsychopharmacol Hung 2022; 24(1): 42-55).